Free Money System Review - Scam or Legit? Free Money System Free Money System Review Free Money System is a binary options trading software that just launched. Discover everything about trading binary with my Free Money System review today.
I've read nothing but people saying that binary options you only lose money but im seeing people making 2-3k a day with binary options. How do you guys feel about BO? Do you have any experience with it?
One guy text me via Instagram, offering me a trade deal basically. I don’t know anything about trading, investing so i come for help. That what the guy explain me : “Binary option trade is the best among all live trading market and my organization is the best in BO/FX option trade we give out 100% guarantee to all our customers trading with us here and also 100% bonus addition to your winning profit okay” “Binary option is an online forex trading (stocks, currencies and gold), it's one of the highest paid investment treasury in the world.” “What is required of you is you setup a trading account on our website after that you'll make an investment deposit to your trading account. I as your account manager I'll be the one to take care of all trading activities on your behalf.” The website: www.urbanfxpro.com Is this a scam or i can invest some money?
Israel billion dolllar fraud scam industry - The binary options industry, which was largely fraudulent, is estimated to have stolen billions of dollars a year from victims around the world and to have employed over 10,000 Israelis
Israeli Scammers Swindle 3000 French of $20 Million, as well as People of Many Other Countries. Another international scam is Israel’s notorious binary options industry, which has brought in $10 billion a year.
Israel billion dolllar fraud scam industry - The binary options industry, which was largely fraudulent, is estimated to have stolen billions of dollars a year from victims around the world and to have employed over 10,000 Israelis
04-15 13:54 - 'It is possible to recover bitcoin lost to scam or binary options. I engaged the services of a hacker and he helped me. His info is recbtc17 at gmail dot com or text/whats app +15187224413' by /u/anthwell7 removed from /r/Bitcoin within 29-39min
Master Sniper Trading Review So Is Master Sniper A Scam Or Legit? Best Binary Options Trading Software! The Truth About Master Snipers Trading System By Adam Weiss Review
Hi How Are You? Master Sniper Trading Review: Find out the Secrets about Master Sniper Trading in this Master Sniper Trading review! To find answers to these questions continue reading my in depth and truthful Master Snipers Trading Review below. Master Sniper Trading Description: Name: Master Sniper Trading By Adam Weiss Niche: Binary Options. I've been testing this trading strategy since the beginning of the month and the results are great Master Sniper is the most reliable auto-trading software! Official Site: Access The NEW Master Snipers Trading System!! CLICK HERE NOW!!! Exactly what is Master Sniper Trading? Master Sniper Trading is basically a binary options trading software that is designed to help traders win and predict the market trends with binary options. The software also provides evaluations of the market conditions so that traders can know what should be your next step. It gives different secret strategies that ultimately helps. traders without using any complicated trading indications Master Sniper Trading Binary Options Trading Strategy Base the Master Sniper Trading trading method. After you see it working, you can start to the technique with routine sized lots. This strategy will certainly pay off with time. Every Forex binary options trader must choose an account type that is in accordance with their requirements and expectations. A larger account does not suggest a bigger revenue potential so it is an excellent idea to start small and quickly add to your account as your returns increase based on the trading choices you make. Binary Options Trading To help you trade binary options correctly, it is very important to have an understanding behind the fundamentals of Binary Options Trading. Currency Trading, or foreign exchange, is based on the perceived value of two currencies pairs to one another, and is influenced by the political stability of the country, inflation and interest rates among other things. Keep this in mind as you trade and discover more about binary options to maximize your learning experience. Master Sniper Trading Summary In summary, there are some obvious concepts that have been tested over time, along with some more recent techniques. that you might not have actually considered. Hopefully, as long as you follow exactly what we suggest in this short article you can either get started with trading with Master Sniper Trading or improve on exactly what you have already done. I highly recommend “Master Sniper Trading” to all my friends. Hurry Up! There Is Only A Very Limited Spots Available So Act Now Before It's Too Late Click Here To Secure Your Master Sniper Trading Software LIFETIME User License!!
Binary Options ATM Review - New trading software - is it a Scam?? Testing and live demonstrated
The Binary Options ATM Review - New Binary Auto Trader. Is it scam? After I've tested many Binary Options services that appears to be nothing but Scams and were getting into most blacklists of important sites, I found out about this new Binary Options ATM software. I was glad having the chance to try and test it. Especially because it was still before the official release of this system to the public worldwide.
I was glad cause testing such a software in such an early stage gives me the chance to promote by recommending a product of high quality. Thus, i can help the product itself but more importantly my followers and subscribers who are eager to hear and read real objective reviews of the latest software. At the same token, when i found such a product to be not worthy or worse - a scam, I feel that this is my duty to let everybody know, At least as much people as i can inform.
At first i was sure that this is exactly the case. My gut feeling told me that this new Auto trading software of Binary Options ATM is a scam. There was something about the deigns that looks like some kind of a video game.. It wasn't a good sign for me. I like simple, clean and professional looking services. Fortunately i don't rely solely on gut feelings and a lesson which I've already learned is not to judge things by their cover! After all the testing and research I've done, i can tell you 100% confidently that i was wrong. Binary Options ATM is legit. This trading robot is not only legit but also profitable and very friendly to use.
As some of my colleagues which are all big site and blogs owners, I've got this opportunity to test this automatic signals software. I've started with a 500 dollars account, even though the minimum is as low as 200-250. My testing was obviously on real live market conditions.
The people behind the Binary Options ATM trading software were so confident. Apparently they let also some of my colleagues to test it with no risks.
It wasn't my money. I've been offered by Binary Options ATM stuff to be funded by them to trade risk free. They did it because they wanted me to publish my results, whether positive or negative, after testing it. They were so confident that i was intrigued. Apparently they knew exactly what they were doing, as here i am, sharing my positive results with you.. and i'm happy to do so with additional couple of thousands in my pockets:)
By the way, don't just trust me and my review. Many people have already tried the Binary Options ATM trading software successfully. On my research I've got to find several different positive Binary Options ATM reviews. People who experienced it and some testimonials from real users. You can find it yourself on the web while looking for it. Do it. You will find even live testing and demonstrations of real people on real accounts.
All of the details I've found, together with my own trading experience with this trading system, completely changed my mind from my initial thoughts. One thing for sure - The Binary Options ATM Auto-Trader is NOT a scam. This is a legit Binary Options signals service.
I must tell you what happened next in my experience of testing. After using it for a couple of weeks, I have 152 trades. 117 of the total are profitable. Easy to calculate that the winning rate so far are 117/152=77. Meaning 77% of In The Money trades. 77 percentage of winning trades! Personally i think it's most impressive, don't you?? I've traded many positions so that the statistic would be more accurate. Not to rely on any coincidence. You can't get into any conclusion with such a system with only 10 or even 20 positions. On all other testimonials and live demonstrations, it was about the same winning rates. The worse that i saw was of 64% and the best was of 83%.
Now i would like to tell you a bit about the features of Binary Options ATM App. A great feature is one that allow you to choose the desired risk level. You can set it between 1 to 3. Obviously 3 is the highest risk level. I suggest that you start with the lowest risk level of 1, and first to trade with the minimum volume amount of 5$ per trade. This is a big advantage as you can control your account, get to know the system, without taking any big risks. On the worse case, if you see 3 losses in a row, which i haven't see so far, then quit for the day. I also like to choose a profit target around 500$. That way you know you can maximum 15$ at the beginning. But on the other hand earning 500$ a day which is more than possible will help you to increase you account gradually and dramatically.##
When you start small you will have the chance to be more familiar with the trading platform and to trust it without feeling any pressure. After that, and once you gain confidence and earn some decent profits, then you can increase the level of risk. If you do it, raise it directly to the level of 3. In addition there is the manual mode. You can trade manually but i don't want to talk about it as much, as this is no big difference from any regular Binary Options trading account.
I find it highly important to note that Binary Options ATM software works only with good brokers. You can find on their supported broker's list some of the best binary brokers in the world. They are all under tight regulation and can be trusted. It means that you can expect to have no issues, and to fell relaxed about your precious money. And of course, important to note again - The use of this trading software is available now for free. It make a real difference. I'm really not sure if it will remain like it after the official release.##
The Sign up is super simple and quick. You don't need any prior knowledge in trading or technology. Just to know how to calculate your profits:) After registering you will be able to start and use this auto trading software in a matter of few minutes. I'm absolutely confident that you'll have fun with this friendly software, especially when you start counting your money..!
You can register to the Binary Options ATM Automated signals you can do it for free HERE
In case that you want to share you experience or have any question and a need for support please let me know. If you have review of Binary Options ATM share it with me, I'll be more than glad to hear you thoughts!
7 Figure Club Review So Is 7 Figure Club A SCAM Or LEGIT? Best Binary Options Trading Software. The Truth About 7 Figure Club Martin Taylor Review
Hey Friend! Please read this 7 Figure Club Review to uncover the Secrets about The 7 Figure Club. So What is 7 Figure Club Software all about? So Does 7 Figure Club Actually Work? Is 7 Figure Club Software application scam or does it really work? To find answers to these concerns continue reading my in depth and truthful 7 Figure Club Review below. 7 Figure Club Description: Name: 7 Figure Club Niche: Binary Options. Official Website: Access The NEW 7 Figure Club!! CLICK HERE NOW!!! What is 7 Figure Club? 7 Figure Club is basically a binary options trading software that is created to help traders win and predict the marketplace trends with binary options. The software likewise offers analyses of the market conditions so that traders can understand what should be your next step. It provides different secret strategies that eventually assists. traders without making use of any complex trading indications or follow charts. 7 Figure Club Binary Options Trading Strategy Base the 7 Figure Club trading strategy. After you see it working, you can begin to execute your strategy with routine sized lots. This approach will certainly settle in time. Every Forex binary options trader should pick an account type that is in accordance with their needs and expectations. A larger account does not indicate a bigger revenue potential so it is a great concept to begin small and quickly add to your account as your returns increase based on the winning trading selections the software makes. Binary Options Trading To help you trade binary options properly, it is important to have an understanding behind the fundamentals of Binary Options Trading. Currency Trading, or foreign exchange, is based upon the viewed value of 2 currencies pairs to one another, and is affected by the political stability of the country, inflation and interest rates among other things. Keep this in mind as you trade and learn more about binary options to maximize your learning experience. 7 Figure Club Summary In summary, there are some obvious ideas that have actually been tested in time, along with some newer methods. that you may not have considered. Ideally, as long as you follow what we recommend in this short article you can either start with trading with 7 Figure Club or enhance on exactly what you have actually currently done. There Is Only A Very Limited Spaces Available So Act Now Before It's Too Late Click Here To Claim Your 7 Figure Club Software LIFETIME User License!! . . . . . . . . . . . . . . Tags: 7 Figure Club app, 7 Figure Club information, 7 Figure Club url, 7 Figure Club website, 7 Figure Club youtube video, 7 Figure Club trading software, get 7 Figure Club, article about 7 Figure Club, 7 Figure Club computer program, 7 Figure Club the truth, 7 Figure Club support, 7 Figure Club support email address, 7 Figure Club help desk, similar than 7 Figure Club, better than 7 Figure Club, 7 Figure Club contact, 7 Figure Club demo, 7 Figure Club video tutorial, how does 7 Figure Club work, is 7 Figure Club the best online is 7 Figure Club a scam, does 7 Figure Club really work, does 7 Figure Club actually work, 7 Figure Club members area, 7 Figure Club login page, 7 Figure Club verification, 7 Figure Club software reviews, 7 Figure Club no fake review, 7 Figure Club Live Broadcast, 7FigureClub.co, 7FigureClub.co review, 7FigureClub.co reviews, is 7 Figure Club real, 7 Figure Club forex trading, 7 Figure Club binary options trading, 7 Figure Club automated app, the 7 Figure Club review, 7 Figure Club signals, 7 Figure Club mac os x, 7 Figure Club broker sign up, 7 Figure Club free download, reviews of 7 Figure Club, 7 Figure Club live results, 7 Figure Club bonus, 7 Figure Club honest review, 7 Figure Club 2015, is 7 Figure Club worth the risk, 7 Figure Club pc desktop, 7 Figure Club free trial,7 Figure Club testimonial, 7 Figure Club scam watch dog, 7 Figure Club warrior forum, 7 Figure Club web version, 7 Figure Club open a account, 7 Figure Club laptop, 7 Figure Club revised Method 2015, 7 Figure Club Unbiased review, is 7 Figure Club all hype?, real people invested in 7 Figure Club, is 7 Figure Club a shame, 7 Figure Club discount, 7 Figure Club binary option watch dog review, 7 Figure Club youtube, seriously will 7 Figure Club work, 7 Figure Club facebook, 7 Figure Club activation code, 7 Figure Club 2015 Working, 7 Figure Club twitter, 7 Figure Club currency trading, 7 Figure Club real person review, 7 Figure Club example trade, will 7 Figure Club work on mobile phone, Completely New 7 Figure Club, 7 Figure Club customer service, new 7 Figure Club, 7 Figure Club webinar, 7 Figure Club webinar replay, 7 Figure Club anybody using this, 7 Figure Club real or fake, is 7 Figure Club live trades real, 7 Figure Club is this a scam, is 7 Figure Club reliable?, 7 Figure Club honest reviews, 7 Figure Club is it a scam, 7 Figure Club download software, 7 Figure Club app review, 7 Figure Club software download, 7 Figure Club forum, 7 Figure Club signals, 7 Figure Club download page, 7 Figure Club Review 2015, 7 Figure Club software demo somebody using it, 7 Figure Club binary software, 7 Figure Club binary options review, 7 Figure Club members, 7 Figure Club scam or legit,7 Figure Club comments, minimum deposit for 7 Figure Club, 7 Figure Club reviews, 7 Figure Club binary today, 7 Figure Club pro review, 7 Figure Club windows 7, 7 Figure Club windows 8 and windows XP, 7 Figure Club scam or real, 7 Figure Club login, 7 Figure Club has anybody out there made any money out of it?, 7 Figure Club vip membership pass, does 7 Figure Club work on autopilot?, 7 Figure Club price, is 7 Figure Club a scam or not, will 7 Figure Club help me, real truth about 7 Figure Club, 7 Figure Club System, 7 Figure Club inside members page, 7 Figure Club software downloads, how to download 7 Figure Club, how to access 7 Figure Club, 7 Figure Club Robot, how to use 7 Figure Club, how to trade with 7 Figure Club, 7 Figure Club NEWS Update and details, 7 Figure Club sign in, the 7 Figure Club trading options, 7 Figure Club info, 7 Figure Club information, 7 Figure Club searching for new winning trades, 7 Figure Club today, 7 Figure Club feedback, 7 Figure Club real user review, 7 Figure Club customer reviews, 7 Figure Club consumer review, 7 Figure Club Review 2015, insider john 7 Figure Club review, george s 7 Figure Club review, 7 Figure Club doesn't work, is 7 Figure Club another scam or legit, 7 Figure Club refund, Activate 7 Figure Club, review of 7 Figure Club, log on to 7 Figure Club, is 7 Figure Club manual binary trading, 7 Figure Club bot review, 7 Figure Club test, 7 Figure Club explanation, what brokers work with 7 Figure Club software, what is 7 Figure Club, 7 Figure Club news, new version of 7 Figure Club, 7 Figure Club fan Page, 7 Figure Club breaking news, 7 Figure Club Register, 7 Figure Club sign up, 7 Figure Club broker sign up, 7 Figure Club real proof, how to activate auto trading on 7 Figure Club,7 Figure Club robot, 7 Figure Club members area, 7 Figure Club sign in, web version 7 Figure Club, should i use 7 Figure Club, 7 Figure Club yes or no, do i need trading experience, 7 Figure Club create account, 7 Figure Club instructions, how to get a 7 Figure Club demo, 7 Figure Club special, desktop 7 Figure Club, 7 Figure Club Secret method, 7 Figure Club Martin Taylor Review,7 Figure Club by Martin Taylor Reviews,Join 7 Figure Club, 7 Figure Club ea trading app, 7 Figure Club limited time, 7 Figure Club pros and cons, 7 Figure Club bad reviews, is 7 Figure Club software automatic binary trading, 7 Figure Club negative and positive review, 7 Figure Club Author, 7 Figure Club creator, who made 7 Figure Club, what is the 7 Figure Club, 7 Figure Club real review, 7 Figure Club broker, 7 Figure Club sign up broker, 7 Figure Club sign up broker review, 7 Figure Club fund broker, 7 Figure Club how to fund broker,7 Figure Club deposit funds into broker, how does 7 Figure Club trade, 7 Figure Club trading bot, what is 7 Figure Club and cost?, 7 Figure Club strategy, 7 Figure Club password reset, 7 Figure Club beta tester, 7 Figure Club comparison, 7 Figure Club questions and answers, rate & review 7 Figure Club, rate and reviews 7 Figure Club, is 7 Figure Club site legit?, 7 Figure Club reviews online, is 7 Figure Club for real, 7 Figure Club login page, 7 Figure Club results, 7 Figure Club winning and losing trades, 7 Figure Club overview, 7 Figure Club training, how to setup 7 Figure Club, 7 Figure Club home, real testimonial on 7 Figure Club system, 7 Figure Club real time trading, start trading with 7 Figure Club, 7 Figure Club proof, 7 Figure Club the truth, Get 7 Figure Club, 7 Figure Club Review Click Here To Join The 7 Figure Club Right NOW!
The Challenges of Designing a Modern Skill, Part 3
Okay, Wendy’s or Walgreens or whoever, I don’t care who you are, you’re listening to the rest.
Introduction to Part 3
Welcome back one last time to “The Challenges of Designing a Modern Skill,” a series where we discuss all aspects of skill design and development. In Part 1, we talked about OSRS’s history with skills, and started the lengthy conversation on Skill Design Philosophy, including the concepts of Core, Expansion, and Integration. This latter topic consumed the entirety of Part 2 as well, which covered Rewards and Motivations, Progression, Buyables, as well as Unconstructive Arguments. Which brings us to today, the final part of our discussion. In this Part 3, we’ll finish up Section 3 – Skill Design Philosophy, then move on to chat about the design and blog process. One last time, this discussion was intended to be a single post, but its length outgrew the post character limit twice. Therefore, it may be important to look at the previous two parts for clarity and context with certain terms. The final product, in its purest, aesthetic, and unbroken form, can be found here.
3-C – Skill Design Philosophy, Continued
3-12 - Balancing
What follows from the discussion about XP and costs, of course, is balancing: the bane of every developer. A company like Riot knows better than anyone that having too many factors to account for makes good balance impossible. Balancing new ideas appropriately is extremely challenging and requires a great respect for current content as discussed in Section 3-5 – Integration. Thankfully, in OSRS we only have three major balancing factors: Profit, XP Rate, and Intensity, and two minor factors: Risk and Leniency. These metrics must amount to some sense of balance (besides Leniency, which as we’ll see is the definition of anti-balance) in order for a piece of content to feel like it’s not breaking the system or rendering all your previous efforts meaningless. It’s also worthy to note that there is usually a skill-specific limit to the numerical values of these metrics. For example, Runecrafting will never receive a training method that grants 200k xp/hr, while for Construction that’s easily on the lower end of the scale. A basic model works better than words to describe these factors, and therefore, being the phenomenal artist that I am, I have constructed one, which I’ve dubbed “The Guthix Scale.” But I’ll be cruel and use words anyway.
Profit: how much you gain from a task, or how much you lose. Gain or loss can include resources, cosmetics, specialized currencies, good old gold pieces, or anything on that line.
XP Rate: how fast you gain XP.
Intensity: how much effort (click intensity), attention (reaction intensity), and thought (planning intensity) you need to put into the activity to perform it well.
Risk: how likely is the loss of your revenue and/or resource investment into the activity. Note that one must be careful with risk, as players are very good at abusing systems intended to encourage higher risk levels to minimize how much they’re actually risking.
Leniency: a measure for how imbalanced a piece of content can be before the public and/or Jagex nerfs it. Leniency serves as a simple modulator to help comprehend when the model breaks or bends in unnatural ways, and is usually determined by how enjoyable and abusable an activity is, such that players don’t want to cause an outrage over it. For example, Slayer has a high level of Leniency; people don’t mind that some Slayer tasks grant amazing XP Rates, great Profits, have middling Intensity, and low Risk. On the other hand, Runecrafting has low levels of Leniency; despite low Risk, many Runecrafting activities demand high Intensity for poor XP Rates and middling Profits.
In the end, don’t worry about applying specific numbers during the conceptual phase of your skill design. However, when describing an activity to your reader, it’s always useful if you give approximations, such as “high intensity” or “low risk,” so that they get an idea of the activity’s design goals as well as to guide the actual development of that activity. Don’t comment on the activity’s Leniency though, as that would be pretty pretentious and isn’t for you to determine anyway.
3-13 - Skill Bloat
What do the arts of weaving, tanning, sowing, spinning, pottery, glassmaking, jewellery, engraving, carving, chiselling, carpentry, and even painting have in common? In real life, there’s only so much crossover between these arts, but in Runescape they’re all simply Crafting. The distinction between what deserves to be its own skill or instead tagged along to a current skill is often arbitrary; this is the great challenge of skill bloat. The fundamental question for many skill concepts is: does this skill have enough depth to stand on its own? The developers of 2006 felt that there was sufficient depth in Construction to make it something separate from Crafting, even if the latter could have covered the former. While there’s often no clean cut between these skills (why does making birdhouses use Crafting instead of Construction?), it is easy to see that Construction has found its own solid niche that would’ve been much too big to act as yet another Expansion of Crafting. On the other hand, a skill with extremely limited scope and value perhaps should be thrown under the umbrella of a larger skill. Take Firemaking: it’s often asked why it deserves to be its own skill given how limited its uses are. This is one of those ideas that probably should have just been thrown under Crafting or even Woodcutting. But again, the developers who made early Runescape did not battle with the same ideas as the modern player; they simply felt like Firemaking was a good idea for a skill. Similarly, the number of topics that the Magic skill covers is so often broken down in other games, like Morrowind’s separation between Illusion, Conjuration, Alteration, Destruction, Mysticism, Restoration, Enchant, Alchemy (closer to Herblore), and Unarmored (closer to Strength and Defense). Why does Runescape not break Magic into more skills? The answer is simple: Magic was created with a much more limited scope in Runescape, and there has not been enough content in any specific magical category to justify another skill being born. But perhaps your skill concept seeks to address this; maybe your Enchantment skill takes the enchanting aspects of Magic away, expands the idea to include current imbues and newer content, and fully fleshes the idea out such that the Magic skill alone cannot contain it. Somewhat ironically, Magic used to be separated into Good and Evil Magic skills in Runescape Classic, but that is another topic. So instead of arguments about what could be thrown under another skill’s umbrella, perhaps we should be asking: is there enough substance to this skill concept for it to stand on its own, outside of its current skill categorization? Of course, this leads to a whole other debate about how much content is enough for a skill idea to deserve individuality, but that would get too deep into specifics and is outside the scope of this discussion.
3-14 - Skill Endgame
Runescape has always been a sandbox MMO, but the original Runescape experience was built more or less with a specific endgame in mind: killing players and monsters. Take the Runescape Classic of 2001: you had all your regular combat skills, but even every other skill had an endgame whose goal was helping combat out. Fishing, Firemaking, and Cooking would provide necessary healing. Smithing and Crafting, along with their associated Gathering skill partners, served to gear you up. Combat was the simple endgame and most mechanics existed to serve that end. However, since those first days, the changing endgame goals of players have promoted a vast expansion of the endgame goals of new content. For example, hitting a 99 in any non-combat skill is an endgame goal in itself for many players, completely separate from that skill’s combat relationship (if any). These goals have increased to aspects like cosmetic collections, pets, maxed stats, all quests completed, all diaries completed, all music tracks unlocked, a wealthy bank, the collection log, boss killcounts, and more. Whereas skills used to have a distinct part of a system that ultimately served combat, we now have a vast variety of endgame goals that a skill can be directed towards. You can even see a growth in this perspective as new skills were released up to 2007: Thieving mainly nets you valuable (or once valuable) items which have extremely flexible uses, and Construction has a strong emphasis on cosmetics for your POH. So when designing your new skill, contemplate what the endgame of your skill looks like. For example, if you are proposing a Gathering skill, what is the Production skill tie-in, and what is the endgame goal of that Production skill? Maybe your new skill Spelunking has an endgame in gathering rare collectibles that can be shown off in your POH. Maybe your new skill Necromancy functions like a Support skill, giving you followers that help speed along resource gathering, and letting you move faster to the endgame goal of the respective Production skill. Whatever it is, a proper, clear, and unified view of an endgame goal helps a skill feel like it serves a distinct and valuable purpose. Note that this could mean that you require multiple skills to be released simultaneously for each to feed into each other and form an appropriate endgame. In that case, go for it – don’t make it a repeat of RS3’s Divination, a Gathering skill left hanging without the appropriate Production skill partner of Invention for over 2 years. A good example of a skill with a direct endgame is… most of them. Combat is a well-accepted endgame, and traditionally, most skills are intended to lend a hand in combat whether by supplies or gear. A skill with a poor endgame would be Hunter: Hunter is so scattered in its ultimate endgame goals, trying to touch on small aspects of everything like combat gear, weight reduction, production, niche skilling tools, and food. There’s a very poor sense of identity to Hunter’s endgame, and it doesn’t help that very few of these rewards are actually viable or interesting in the current day. Similarly, while Slayer has a strong endgame goal it is terrible in its methodology, overshadowing other Production skills in their explicit purpose. A better design for Slayer’s endgame would have been to treat it as a secondary Gathering skill, to work almost like a catalyst for other Gathering-Production skill relationships. In this mindset, Slayer is where you gather valuable monster drops, combine it with traditional Gathering resources like ores from Mining, then use a Production skill like Smithing to meld them into the powerful gear that is present today. This would have kept other Gathering and Production skills at the forefront of their specialities, in contrast to today’s situation where Slayer will give fully assembled gear that’s better than anything you could receive from the appropriate skills (barring a few items that need a Production skill to piece together).
3-15 - Alternate Goals
From a game design perspective, skills are so far reaching that it can be tempting to use them to shift major game mechanics to a more favourable position. Construction is an example of this idea in action: Construction was very intentionally designed to be a massive gold sink to help a hyperinflating economy. Everything about it takes gold out of the game, whether through using a sawmill, buying expensive supplies from stores, adding rooms, or a shameless piece of furniture costing 100m that is skinned as, well, 100m on a shameless piece of furniture. If you’re clever about it, skills are a legitimately good opportunity for such change. Sure, the gold sink is definitely a controversial feature of Construction, but for the most part it’s organic and makes sense; fancy houses and fancy cosmetics are justifiably expensive. It is notable that the controversy over Construction’s gold sink mechanism is probably levied more against the cost of training, rather than the cost of all its wonderful aesthetics. Perhaps that should have been better accounted for in its design phase, but now it is quite set in stone. To emphasize that previous point: making large scale changes to the game through a new skill can work, but it must feel organic and secondary to the skill’s main purpose. Some people really disliked Warding because they felt it tried too hard to fix real, underlying game issues with mechanics that didn’t thematically fit or were overshadowing the skill’s Core. While this may or may not be true, if your new skill can improve the game’s integrity without sacrificing its own identity, you could avoid this argument entirely. If your skill Regency has a Core of managing global politics, but also happens to serve as a resource sink to help your failing citizens, then you’ve created a strong Core design while simultaneously improving the profitability of Gathering skills.
3-16 - The Combat No-Touch Rule
So, let’s take a moment to examine the great benefits and rationale of RS2’s Evolution of Combat: This space has been reserved for unintelligible squabbling. With that over, it’s obvious that the OSRS playerbase is not a big fan of making major changes to the combat system. If there’s anything that defines the OSRS experience, it has to be the janky and abusable combat system that we love. So, in the past 7 years of OSRS, how many times have you heard someone pitch a new combat skill? Practically no one ever has; a new combat skill, no matter how miniscule, would feel obtrusive to most players, and likely would not even receive 25% of votes in a poll. This goes right back to Section 3-5 – Integration, and the importance of preserving the fundamentals of OSRS’s design. I know that my intention with this discussion was to be as definitive about skill design as possible, and in that spirit I should be delving into the design philosophy specifically behind combat skills, but I simply don’t see the benefit of me trying, and the conversation really doesn’t interest me that much. It goes without saying that as expansive as this discussion is, it does not cover every facet of skill design, which is a limitation both of my capabilities and desire to do so.
3-17 - Aesthetics
I don’t do aesthetics well. I like them, I want them, but I do not understand them; there are others much better equipped to discuss this topic than I. Nonetheless, here we go. Since the dawn of OSRS, debates over art style and aesthetics have raged across Gielinor. After all, the OSRS Team is filled with modern day artists while OSRS is an ancient game. What were they supposed to do? Keep making dated graphics? Make content with a modernized and easily digestible style? Something in-between? While many players shouted for more dated graphics, they were approached by an interesting predicament: which dated graphics did they want? We had a great selection present right from the start of OSRS: 2002, 2003, 2004, 2005, 2006, and 2007. People hungry for nostalgia chose the era that they grew up in, leading to frequent requests for older models like the dragon or imp, most of which were denied by Jagex (except the old Mining rock models). But which era was OSRS supposed to follow? Jagex elected to carve their own path, but not without heavy criticism especially closer to OSRS’s conception. However, they adapted to player requests and have since gone back and fixed many of the blatant early offenders (like the Kingdom of Kourend) and adopted a more consistent flavour, one that generally respects the art style of 2007. Even though it doesn’t always hit the mark, one has to appreciate the OSRS artists for making their best attempt and listening to feedback, and here’s to hoping that their art style examination mentioned in June 2020’s Gazette bears fruit. But what exactly is the old school art style? There are simple systems by which most players judge it in OSRS, usually by asking questions like, “Would you believe if this existed in 2007?” More informed artists will start pointing out distinct features that permeated most content from back in the day, such as low quality textures, low poly models, low FPS animations, a “low fantasy” or grounded profile that appeals somewhat to realism, reducing cartoonish exaggerations, and keeping within the lore. Compiled with this, music and sound design help that art style come to life; it can be very hard on immersion when these don’t fit. An AGS would sound jarring if its special attack sounded like a weak dagger stab, and having to endure Country Jig while roaming Hosidius suddenly sweeps you off into a different universe. But coming back to skill design, the art, models, and sound design tend to be some of the last features, mostly because the design phase doesn’t demand such a complete picture of a skill. However, simple concept art and models can vastly improve how a skill concept is communicated and comfort players who are concerned about maintaining that “old school feel.” This will be touched on again later in this discussion under Section 5-2 – Presentation and Beta Testing.
3-18 - Afterword
Now we’ve set down the modern standards for a new skill, but the statements that started this section bear repeating: the formula we’ve established does not automatically make a good or interesting skill, as hard as we might have tried. Once again, harken back to the First Great Irony: that we are trying to inject the modern interpretation of what defines a skill upon a game that was not necessarily built to contain it. Therefore, one could just as easily deny each of the components described above, as popular or unpopular as the act might be, and their opinion could be equally valid and all this effort meaningless. Don’t take these guidelines with such stringency as to disregard all other views.
5-0 - The OSRS Team and the Design Process
If you’ve followed me all the way here, you’re likely A) exhausted and fed up of any conversation concerning new skills, or B) excited, because you’ve just struck an incredible skill idea (or perhaps one that’s always hung around your head) that happens to tick off all the above checkboxes. But unfortunately for you B types, it’s about to get pretty grim, because we’re going to go through every aspect of skill design that’s exterior to the game itself. We’ll be touching on larger topics like democracy, presentation, player mindsets, effort, and resource consumption. It’ll induce a fantastic bout of depression, so don’t get left behind.
5-1 - Designing a Skill
Thus far, Jagex has offered three potential skills to OSRS, each of which has been denied. This gives us the advantage of understanding how the skill design process works behind the scenes and lets us examine some of the issues Jagex has faced with presenting a skill to the players. The first problem is the “one strike and you’re out” phenomenon. Simply put, players don’t like applying much effort into reading and learning. They’ll look at a developer blog highlighting a new skill idea, and if you’re lucky they’ll even read the whole thing, but how about the second developer blog? The third? Fourth? Even I find it hard to get that far. In general, people don’t like long detail-heavy essays or blogs, which is why I can invoke the ancient proverb “Ban Emily” into this post and it’ll go (almost) completely unnoticed. No matter how many improvements you make between developer blogs, you will quickly lose players with each new iteration. Similarly, developer blogs don’t have the time to talk about skill design philosophy or meta-analyse their ideas – players would get lost far too fast. This is the Second Great Irony of skill design: the more iterations you have of a lengthy idea, the less players will keep up with you. This was particularly prominent with Warding: Battle Wards were offered in an early developer blog but were quickly cut when Jagex realized how bad the idea was. Yet people would still cite Battle Wards as the reason they voted against Warding, despite the idea having been dropped several blogs before. Similarly, people would often comment that they hated that Warding was being polled multiple times; it felt to them like Jagex was trying to brute-force it into the game. But Warding was only ever polled once, and only after the fourth developer blog - the confusion was drawn from how many times the skill was reiterated and from the length of the public design process. Sure, there are people for whom this runs the opposite way; they keep a close eye on updates and judge a piece of content on the merits of the latest iteration, but this is much less common. You could argue that one should simply disregard the ignorant people as blind comments don't contribute to the overall discussion, but you should remember that these players are also the ones voting for the respective piece of content. You could also suggest re-educating them, which is exactly what Jagex attempts with each developer blog, and still people won’t get the memo. And when it comes to the players themselves, can the playerbase really be relied on to re-educate itself? Overall, the Second Great irony really hurts the development process and is practically an unavoidable issue. What’s the alternative? To remove the developer-player interface that leads to valuable reiterations, or does you simply have to get the skill perfect in the first developer blog? It’s not an optimal idea, but it could help: have a small team of “delegates” – larger names that players can trust, or player influencers – come in to review a new, unannounced skill idea under NDA. If they like it, chances are that other players will too. If they don’t, reiterate or toss out the skill before it’s public. That way, you’ve had a board of experienced players who are willing to share their opinions to the public helping to determine the meat and potatoes of the skill before it is introduced to the casual eye. Now, a more polished and well-accepted product can be presented on the first run of selling a skill to the public, resulting in less reiterations being required, and demanding less effort from the average player to be fully informed over the skill’s final design.
5-2 - Presentation and Beta Testing
So you’ve got a great idea, but how are you going to sell it to the public? Looking at how the OSRS Team has handled it throughout the years, there’s a very obvious learning curve occurring. Artisan had almost nothing but text blogs being thrown to the players, Sailing started introducing some concept art and even a trailer with terrible audio recording, and Warding had concept art, in game models, gifs, and a much fancier trailer with in-game animations. A picture or video is worth a thousand words, and often the only words that players will take out of a developer blog. You might say that presentation is everything, and that would be more true in OSRS than most games. Most activities in OSRS are extremely basic, involve minimal thought, and are incredibly grindy. Take Fishing: you click every 20 seconds on a fishing spot that is randomly placed along a section of water, get rid of your fish, then keep clicking those fishing spots. Boiling it down further, you click several arbitrary parts of your computer screen every 20 seconds. It’s hardly considered engaging, so why do some people enjoy it? Simply put: presentation. You’re given a peaceful riverside environment to chill in, you’re collecting a bunch of pixels shaped like fish, and a number tracking your xp keeps ticking up and telling you that it matters. Now imagine coming to the players with a radical new skill idea: Mining. You describe that Mining is where you gather ores that will feed into Smithing and help create gear for players to use. The audience ponders momentarily, but they’re not quite sure it feels right and ask for a demonstration. You show them some gameplay, but your development resources were thin and instead of rocks, you put trees as placeholders. Instead of ores in your inventory, you put logs as placeholders. Instead of a pickaxe, your character is swinging a woodcutting axe as a placeholder. Sure, the mechanics might act like mining instead of woodcutting, but how well is the skill going to sell if you haven’t presented it correctly or respected it contextually? Again, presentation is everything. Players need to be able to see the task they are to perform, see the tools they’ll use, and see the expected outcomes; otherwise, whatever you’re trying to sell will feel bland and unoriginal. And this leads to the next level of skill presentation that has yet to be employed: Beta Worlds. Part of getting the feel of an activity is not just watching, it but acting it out as well - you’ll never understand the thrill of skydiving unless you’ve actually been skydiving. Beta Worlds are that chance for players to act out a concept without risking the real game’s health. A successful Beta can inspire confidence in players that the skill has a solid Core and interesting Expansions, while a failed Beta will make them glad that they got to try it and be fully informed before putting the skill to a poll (although that might be a little too optimistic for rage culture). Unfortunately, Betas are not without major disadvantages, the most prominent of which we shall investigate next.
5-3 - Development Effort
If you thought that the previous section on Skill Design Philosophy was lengthy and exhausting, imagine having to know all that information and then put it into practice.Mentally designing a skill in your head can be fun, but putting all that down on paper and making it actually work together, feel fully fleshed out, and following all the modern standards that players expect is extremely heavy work, especially when it’s not guaranteed to pay off in the polls like Quest or Slayer content. That’s not even taking into account the potentially immense cost of developing a new skill should it pass a poll. Whenever people complain that Jagex is wasting their resources trying to make that specific skill work, Jagex has been very explicit about the costs to pull together a design blog being pretty minimal. Looking at the previous blogs, Jagex is probably telling the truth. It’s all just a bunch of words, a couple art sketches, and maybe a basic in-game model or gif. Not to downplay the time it takes to write well, design good models, or generate concept art, but it’s nothing like the scale of resources that some players make it out to be. Of course, if a Beta was attempted as suggested last section, this conversation would take a completely new turn, and the level of risk to invested resources would exponentially increase. But this conversation calls to mind an important question: how much effort and resources do skills require to feel complete? Once upon a time, you could release a skill which was more or less unfinished. Take Slayer: it was released in 2005 with a pretty barebones structure. The fundamentals were all there, but the endgame was essentially a couple cool best-in-slot weapons and that was it. Since then, OSRS has updated the skill to include a huge Reward Shop system, feature 50% more monsters to slay, and to become an extremely competitive money-maker. Skills naturally undergo development over time, but it so often comes up during the designing of an OSRS skill that it "doesn't have enough to justify its existence." This was touched on deeply in Section 3-13 – Skill Bloat, but deserves reiterating here. While people recognize that skills continually evolve, the modern standard expects a new skill, upon release, to be fully preassembled before purchase. Whereas once you could get away with releasing just a skill's Core and working on Expansions down the line, that is no longer the case. But perhaps a skill might stand a better chance now than it did last year, given that the OSRS Team has doubled in number since that time. However, judging from the skill design phases that have previously been attempted (as we’ve yet to see a skill development phase), the heaviest cost has been paid in developer mentality and motivational loss. When a developer is passionate about an idea, they spend their every waking hour pouring their mind into how that idea is going to function,especially while they’re not at work. And then they’re obligated to take player feedback and adapt their ideas, sometimes starting from scratch, particularly over something as controversial as a skill. Even if they have tough enough skin to take the heavy criticism that comes with skill design, having to write and rewrite repeatedly over the same idea to make it “perfect” is mentally exhausting. Eventually, their motivation drains as their labour bears little fruit with the audience, and they simply want to push it to the poll and be done with it. Even once all their cards are down, there’s still no guarantee that their efforts will be rewarded, even less so when it comes to skills. With such a high mental cost with a low rate of success, you have to ask, “Was it worth it?” And that’s why new skill proposals are far and few between. A new skill used to be exciting for the development team in the actual days of 2007, as they had the developmental freedom to do whatever they wanted, but in the modern day that is not so much the case.
5-4 - The Problems of Democracy
Ever since the conceptualization of democracy in the real world, people have been very aware of its disadvantages. And while I don’t have the talent, knowledge, or time to discuss every one of these factors, there are a few that are very relevant when it comes to the OSRS Team and the polling process. But first we should recognize the OSRS Team’s relationship with the players. More and more, the Team acts like a government to its citizens, the players, and although this situation was intentionally instated with OSRS’s release, it’s even more prominent now. The Team decides the type of content that gets to go into a poll, and the players get their input over whether that particular piece makes it in. Similarly, players make suggestions to the Team that, in many cases, the Team hadn’t thought of themselves. This synergy is phenomenal and almost unheard of among video games, but the polling system changes the mechanics of this relationship. Polls were introduced to the burned and scarred population of players at OSRS’s release in 2013. Many of these players had just freshly come off RS2 after a series of disastrous updates or had quit long before from other controversies. The Squeal of Fortune, the Evolution of Combat, even the original Wilderness Removal had forced numerous players out and murdered their trust in Jagex. To try and get players to recommit to Runescape, Jagex offered OSRS a polling system by which the players would determine what went into the game, where the players got to hold all the cards. They also asked the players what threshold should be required for polled items to pass, and among the odd 50% or 55% being shouted out, the vast majority of players wanted 70%, 75%, 80%, or even 85%. There was a massive population in favour of a conservative game that would mostly remain untouched, and therefore kept pure from the corruption RS2 had previously endured. Right from the start, players started noticing holes in this system. After all, the OSRS Team was still the sole decider of what would actually be polled in the first place. Long-requested changes took forever to be polled (if ever polled at all) if the OSRS Team didn’t want to deal with that particular problem or didn’t like that idea. Similarly, the Team essentially had desk jobs with a noose kept around their neck – they could perform almost nothing without the players, their slave masters, seeing, criticizing, and tearing out every inch of developmental or visionary freedom they had. Ever hear about the controversy of Erin the duck? Take a look at the wiki or do a search through the subreddit history. It’s pretty fantastic, and a good window into the minds of the early OSRS playerbase. But as the years have gone on, the perspective of the players has shifted. There is now a much healthier and more trusting relationship between them and the Team, much more flexibility in what the players allow the Team to handle, and a much greater tolerance and even love of change. But the challenges of democracy haven’t just fallen away. Everyone having the right to vote is a fundamental tenet of the democratic system, but unfortunately that also means that everyone has the right to vote. For OSRS, that means that every member, whether it’s their first day in game, their ten thousandth hour played, those who have no idea about what the poll’s about, those who haven’t read a single quest (the worst group), those who RWT and bot, those who scam and lure, and every professional armchair developer like myself get to vote. In short, no one will ever be perfectly informed on every aspect of the game, or at least know when to skip when they should. Similarly, people will almost never vote in favour of making their game harder, even at the cost of game integrity, or at least not enough people would vote in such a fashion to reach a 75% majority. These issues are well recognized. The adoption of the controversial “integrity updates” was Jagex’s solution to these problems. In this way, Jagex has become even more like a government to the players. The average citizen of a democratic country cannot and will not make major decisions that favour everyone around themselves if it comes at a personal cost. Rather, that’s one of the major roles of a government: to make decisions for changes for the common good that an individual can’t or won’t make on their own. No one’s going to willingly hand over cash to help repave a road on the opposite side of the city – that’s why taxes are a necessary evil. It’s easy to see that the players don’t always know what’s best for their game and sometimes need to rely on that parent to decide for them, even if it results in some personal loss. But players still generally like the polls, and Jagex still appears to respect them for the most part. Being the government of the game, Jagex could very well choose to ignore them, but would risk the loss of their citizens to other lands. And there are some very strong reasons to keep them: the players still like having at least one hand on the wheel when it comes to new content or ideas. Also, it acts as a nice veto card should Jagex try to push RS3’s abusive tactics on OSRS and therefore prevent such potential damage. But now we come to the topic of today: the introduction of a new skill. Essentially, a new skill must pass a poll in order to enter the game. While it’s easy to say, “If a skill idea is good enough, it’ll pass the threshold,” that’s not entirely true. The only skill that could really pass the 75% mark is not necessarily a well-designed skill, but rather a crowd-pleasing skill. While the two aren’t mutually exclusive, the latter is far easier to make than the former. Take Dungeoneering: if you were to poll it today as an exact replica of RS2’s version, it would likely be the highest scoring skill yet, perhaps even passing, despite every criticism that’s been previously emphasized describing why it has no respect for the current definition of “skill.” Furthermore, a crowd-pleasing skill can easily fall prey to deindividualization of vision and result in a bland “studio skill” (in the same vein as a “studio film”), one that feels manufactured by a board of soulless machines rather than a director’s unique creation. This draws straight back to the afore-mentioned issues with democracy: that people A) don’t always understand what they’re voting for or against, and B) people will never vote for something that makes their game tougher or results in no benefit to oneself. Again, these were not issues in the old days of RS2, but are the problems we face with our modern standards and decision making systems. The reality that must be faced is that the polling system is not an engine of creation nor is it a means of constructive feedback – it’s a system of judgement, binary and oversimplified in its methodology. It’s easy to interact with and requires no more than 10 seconds of a player’s time, a mere mindless moment, to decide the fate of an idea made by an individual or team, regardless of their deep or shallow knowledge of game mechanics, strong or weak vision of design philosophy, great or terrible understanding of the game’s history, and their awareness of blindness towards the modern community. It’s a system which disproportionately boils down the quality of discussion that is necessitated by a skill, which gives it the same significance as the question “Should we allow players to recolour the Rocky pet by feeding it berries?” with the only available answers being a dualistic “This idea is perfect and should be implemented exactly as outlined” or “This idea is terrible and should never be spoken of again.” So what do you do? Let Jagex throw in whatever they want? Reduce the threshold, or reduce it just for skills? Make a poll that lists a bunch of skills and forces the players to choose one of them to enter the game? Simply poll the question, “Should we have a new skill?” then let Jagex decide what it is? Put more options on the scale of “yes” to “no” and weigh each appropriately? All these options sound distasteful because there are obvious weaknesses to each. But that is the Third Great Irony we face: an immense desire for a new skill, but no realistic means to ever get one.
6-0 - Conclusion
I can only imagine that if you’ve truly read everything up to this point, it’s taken you through quite the rollercoaster. We’ve walked through the history of OSRS skill attempts, unconstructive arguments, various aspects of modern skill design philosophy, and the OSRS Team and skill design process. When you take it all together, it’s easy to get overwhelmed by all the thought that needs to go into a modern skill and all the issues that might prevent its success. Complexity, naming conventions, categorizations, integration, rewards and motivations, bankstanding and buyables, the difficulties of skill bloat, balancing, and skill endgames, aesthetics, the design process, public presentation, development effort, democracy and polling - these are the challenges of designing and introducing modern skills. To have to cope with it all is draining and maybe even impossible, and therefore it begs the question: is trying to get a new skill even worth it? Maybe. Thanks for reading. Tl;dr: Designing a modern skill requires acknowledging the vast history of Runescape, understanding why players make certain criticisms and what exactly they’re saying in terms of game mechanics, before finally developing solutions. Only then can you subject your ideas to a polling system that is built to oversimplify them.
i'm new in this forex stuff (not even starting yet) & first time visiting Forex. But i've read that forex basically gambling (guessing either it goes up or down, and you got previous data as reference). I'm also read about foolproof gambling tricks that works in real life roulette. Basically it goes like this :
bet $1 on red - if you win, repeat step 1.
if you lose, bet $3. if you win, repeat step 1.
if you lose again, bet $6. if you win, repeat step 1.
if you lose again, bet $14. if you win repeat step 1.
if you lose again, bet $31. if you win, repeat step 1
so, can this be apply on forex trading? (there's lot ads about forex trading apps, thinking to try it) can't profit big, but seem cant lose either. might be a good strategy. any thought? edit 1 : what i mean in this forex is binary options, which some forex trading apps operates. edit 2 : it takes 5 unlucky trading before $55 account blown off. is that really common to get 5 unlucky trading in a row? edit 3 : here's the math (cnp from reply) some forex apps (like expert option or olymp trade) operate on binary option (this is unregulated securities?) where usually they give 80% return on trade. the math goes like this :
$1 trade and win = $0.80 profit
lose then $3 trade and win = $2.4 - $1 (lose) = $1.4 profit
lose then $6 trade and win = $4.8 - $4 (lose) = $0.8 profit
lose then $14 trade and win = $11.2 - $10 (lose) = $1.2 profit
lose then $31 trade and win = $24.8 - $24 (lose) = $0.8 profit
profit means got back your initial too
edit 4 : some reply said **binary options type forex trading apps** are scam & fraud. bummer. maybe trading via smartphone isnt easy as i thought. edit 5 : still, add some ability to reading indicator & chart could help avoiding 5 unlucky trading in a row. damn, if i'm a programmer, i'll make a trading bots based on this idea xD
Be careful of u/MrKayantheinvestor - PM'd me after I made a post on here (Seems like a Binary options trading pyramid scheme)
I just wanted to put a PSA up about this guy. He messaged me after I made a post in this subreddit about wanting to invest with him on something called Binary Options Trading. Seems like a scam and he's messaging people who might have some spare cash. Sorry if this is against the rules.
Binary Options. True or Scam? Home; What are Binary Options? The shortest Binary Options definition is a bet that is made on financial price asset (if its price goes up or down) with an expiration time to finish that bet. The bet is to wager on the fall or rise in the price of a product / financial asset, nothing more, nothing less. Simple, no? So, now that you understand the main idea, let ... Binary Options are so popular because they are so easy to understand and you can make a lot of money in a short time. My advice to you: It is very important to choose a good broker. Some small brokers are scamming users, that’s why a lot of people think Binary Options are a scam. Definitely, it is not a scam if you trade with a safe company. A French-Israeli man linked to a high-profile binary options fraud scheme is under police custody in Israel for defrauding French citizens, most of them were elderly, in a follow-up scam. Israeli news sources reported that Ilan Abraham Marco, who immigrated from France ten years ago, has been arrested for a diverse list of charges. Namely, he ... Binary Options Trading Scam: How To Avoid. The first recommendation is that you shouldn’t gamble on binary options trading, but again, it’s gambling. A lot of people think that they are good at it. Many even think they are very good, even when they lose. They always find the wrong reason for their lost bet and start over again, as if they would learn from the lesson of the lost bet. The ... Are Binary Options A Scam? The term “scam” covers a wide range of behaviour, from providing misleading information to lure you in, through to vanishing account balances – and even dishonest trading advice. Likewise, a particular broker might not be technically fraudulent in its behaviour; it’s just that the service available on the platform (such as highly unreliable uptime or failure ... Are Binary Options Scam or Legit? A binary option is a financial option in which the payoff is a fixed amount or nothing at all. Binary options can be deceptive, yet they are simple to understand, which makes them a popular choice among low skilled traders. The most commonly traded commodities here are stocks, indices, and forex. The options, having a clear expiration date, time and strike ... Many new binary option traders get hooked by a video about binary trading signals, or a binary options robot. The Scam Works Like This: A fake company opens a website that looks like a legitimate binary options broker. They create a trading signals software that promises 100% accuracy! When you join the scam, you quickly lose your initial deposit of $250. You then get a phone call from a ... Much of the binary options market operates through Internet-based trading platforms that are not necessarily complying with applicable U.S. regulatory requirements and may be engaging in illegal activity. Investors should be aware of fraudulent promotion schemes involving binary options and binary options trading platforms. What is a Binary Option? If you are offered binary options, it is probably a scam. Binary options are a form of fixed-odds betting. Typically, a trade involves whether an event will happen or not (for example, will the price of a particular share or asset go up) and the outcome is either yes or no. If the investor is correct, they ‘win’ and should see a return on their investment; if they’re wrong, they lose ... Scams using binary options are unfortunately quite common, as you can tell from our list of fraud brokers and services. If you are concerned about falling prey, this guide explains how to avoid scams in the UK. Are Binary Options a Scam? In short, no. Binaries are, in our opinion, a good product. There are, however, unscrupulous brokers and other service providers out there preying on ...
Hi Friends i no have good experience with Opteck binary option its all i explain ready if you have any question ask me Shah +639495702504. Binary Options Trading is a SCAM Operated by Criminals I don't want this channel to be about exposing scams. I've created a few videos on scam artists and criminals. Once I'm done posting them, I ... Best Binary Options Brokers VS Scam Brokers - Incl. Binary Robots -- Good to know! - Duration: 11:30. The Binary Coach 19,462 views. 11:30. Language: English Location: United States ... Have you ever been tempted to join binary options? Ever had a bad experience with binary options Recovery? Have you ever been scammed? How do you recover fro... Are Binary Options a SCAM ? - Duration: 11:50. Investors Underground 184,581 views. 11:50 . Moving Average Trading Secrets (This is What You Must Know...) - Duration: 26:03. Rayner Teo 408,520 ... Best Binary Options Brokers VS Scam Brokers - Incl. Binary Robots -- Good to know! - Duration: 11:30. The Binary Coach 19,970 views. 11:30. How To Turn $10 Into $10,000 With The BLW Signals Group ... Binary Options Blacklist http://binaryoptionschannel.com/black-list-scams/ Watch my video and learn how to avoid scams and shady offers. For questions concer...